Something that the
movie “Apocalypse Now” reveals about the psychology of soldiers is that madness
comes with adaptation. What this means is that a prolonged exposure to a mad,
wild, and hostile environment is very likely to cause a similar effect in your
behavior, this is because humans are adaptable by nature. Thus, when soldiers
are exposed to the constant danger of being in the edge between life and death,
killing, watching others die, torturing, feeling tortured, coming to realize
that human life holds a rather low value in comparison to being back home, and
adding other secondary factors like Vietnam´s heat, dirt, mud, and rainy
weather; then they adapt, and madness becomes a result of such adaptation, as
it is that reckless behavior with complete disregard for your own or others´
lives what would allow you to keep going, to keep yourself alive in such
environment. Examples include Captain Willard´s unstable behavior, such as when
he punched a mirror while drinking vast amounts of alcohol, while stating that he
had spent time in the jungle (Vietnam), and sometimes would wish to wake up back
in it, and when (After killing his objective) he would silently walk away covered
in dirt, camouflage, and blood, between some natives just to leave the area, leaving
us to wonder just how unstable his mind would be by then. A soldier named Lance
B. Johnson also happened to experience a peculiar change in behavior during his
time in Vietnam, as he is portrayed at first as a young soldier who probably didn´t
even know how to use a gun properly, but by the end of the movie viewers could perceive
that he wasn´t quite all sane; he had killed many people, and most of his partners
died, at the end he had become part of a Vietnamese tribe and felt like one of them,
only to be pulled away by Captain Willard.
One theme that echoes from
O´Brien´s writings in this film is the idea that there is no moral in a war story.
Soldiers followed orders, they didn´t know why, but they carried them anyways. Willard
was sent to kill a Colonel whose services were no longer required by the army, he
didn´t know why, and the reasons given to him (Madness and murder) did not make
enough sense either. After accomplishing his objective, we find no moral, no real
satisfaction, and no real purpose. The things soldiers did were not ethical, and
did not seem to carry much purpose. Despite being a movie about the U.S. Army made
by Americans, there was no bias to support the army or the war. If anything, the
Vietnamese seemed completely overwhelmed and outmatched, they seemed like victims,
so what was the moral? Like O´Brien often pointed out… there wasn´t one.
No comments:
Post a Comment